Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Schenck

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2009No. 20070688PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INTRODUCTION

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

T1 In a public corporation, directors and officers owe the corporation and the shareholders collectively a duty to act in good faith and in the best interest of the corporation. In a partnership, each partner owes each of the other partners individually a duty to act with the utmost good faith. The appellant in this case, Samuel R. McLaughlin, a minority shareholder in a closely held corporation, asks this court to impose on shareholders in such corporations a duty to individual shareholders similar to the duty owed in a partnership. McLaughlin also asks us…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Hoggett v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  3. Wilkes v. Springside Nursing Home, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. In Re the Judicial Dissolution of Kemp & Beatley, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Zimmerman v. BogoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Robert B. Allen v. Devon Energy Holdings, L.L.C. F/K/A Chief Holdings, L.L.C, and Trevor D. Rees-Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  2. Shah v. Intermountain Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  3. Haik v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Danuser v. IDA Marketing Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. McLaughlin v. SchenkUtah Supreme Court · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API