Legal Opinion

Storrer v. KIER CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1997No. 22724PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Gary Storrer d/b/a Gary’s Westland Motors (Storrer) appeals from the dismissal of his aetion to recover attorney fees incurred in the arbitration of his contract dispute with Kier Construction Corporation (Kier). We conclude that because attorney fees are not awardable by the arbitrators pursuant to I.C. § 7-910 and because Storrer’s suit for fees in the district court was not an action to recover on a “commercial transaction” contemplated by I.C. § 12-120(3), the district court properly dismissed the action for failure to state a claim. Accordingly, we affirm the order…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wolfe v. Farm Bureau InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Idaho Power Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Emery v. United Pacific InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Allison v. John M. Biggs, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. Omnicare, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Moore v. Omnicare, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API