Legal Opinion

Rudolph Bros. v. Husat

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1961No. 4191PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.

Plaintiff sold sugar to tbe defendant bakery-over a period of years. At each delivery a statement was presented containing tbe words “sold to Husat’s Bakery” and also containing tbe quantity and price of tbe sugar. Upon each slip at delivery an agent of tbe defendant wrote “Husat’s Bakery” and signed bis name.

Plaintiff claims that each slip constitutes a contract in writing making tbe statement a “speciality, or an agreement, contract or promise in writing” and bence subject to Section 2305.06, Revised Code, and actionable witbin fifteen years.

Defendant claims tbe signature on tbis particular…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. El Ranco, Inc. v. NEW YORK MEAT AND PROVISION CO.Nevada Supreme Court · 1972
  2. O'Nesti v. Debartolo Realty Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Claxton v. MainsOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union. 8 v. GromnickiOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Barclays American/Commercial, Inc. v. ROYP Marketing Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API