Legal Opinion
Lopez Castro v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0818PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs, who worked as laborers for a sub-subcontractor in the construction of a District of Columbia building, allege that they were underpaid for their efforts. They have sued under the federal Davis-Bacon Act (DBA), 40 U.S.C. § 3141 et seq., in an effort to collect against the prime contractor’s construction bond, which was secured pursuant to the District of Columbia’s Little Miller Act (DCLMA), D.C.Code § 2-201.02 et seq. Defendant insurance companies guaranteed the bond as co-sureties. In moving to dismiss, they now…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States ex rel. Krol v. Arch InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Bulwer v. EchoNous, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- District of Columbia Ex Rel. Strittmatter Metro, LLC v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Roberts v. GallagherDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024