Fritz v. Sroczyk
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINTON, Chief Judge.
Defendant in the trial court has appealed a final judgment entered upon a jury verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The sole point presented for our decision is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for failure of plaintiff to prosecute within a period of one year during the pendency of the cause in the trial court.
It affirmatively appears from the record on appeal that after this suit was instituted no action was taken by the filing of pleadings, order of court, or otherwise in the prosecution of the cause during the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adams Engineering Co. v. Construction Products Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1963
- Little v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- May v. State Ex Rel. ErvinSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Fulton v. Poston Bridge & Iron, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Newman v. BennefeldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Popkin v. CrispenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Reddish v. ForlinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Chapman v. Universal Underwriters Ins.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989