Legal Opinion

Reddish v. Forlines

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 7, 1968No. J-203PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

207 So.2d 703 (1968)

Linda P. REDDISH, a Minor, through Isham H. Reddish, Her Father and Next Friend, and Isham H. Reddish, Individually, Appellants,

v.

George Douglas FORLINES, Appellee.

No. J-203.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

March 7, 1968.

John J. Sulik, of Dawson, Galant, Maddox, Boyer, Sulik & Nichols, Jacksonville, for appellants.

No Appearance for appellee.

WIGGINTON, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs have appealed a final judgment dismissing their action for want of prosecution. Appellants contend that the judgment of the trial court constitues an abuse of discretion not justified…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hassenteufel v. Howard JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Croker v. ChillingworthSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Owens v. Ken's Paint and Body ShopDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Rosenfeld v. GlicksteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  5. Macfarlane v. HillsSupreme Court of Florida · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harris v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. AM. SALVAGE & JOBBING CO., INC. v. SalomonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Popkin v. CrispenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  4. Koppers Company, Inc. v. Victoire Development Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
  5. Milu, Inc. v. DukeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API