Legal Opinion

Albers v. Reinecke

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 10, 1937No. 6214Published

1Opinion of the Court

MAJOR, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the District Court denying appellant’s claim for refund in the amount of $10,095.38, with certain interest thereon, asserted to have been illegally collected for the year 1920. The controversy involves a construction of section 234 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1077) as follows:

“Sec. 234. (a) That in computing the net income of a corporation subject to the tax imposed by section 230 there shall be allowed as deductions: * * *
“(5) Debts ascertained to be worthless and charged off within the taxable year.”

A jurisdictional question…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spring City Foundry Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Federal Land Bank v. WarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Commissioner v. Spring City Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API