Legal Opinion

Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District v. Stockton East Water District

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 2016No. C072218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAYE, P. J.

California requires public owners of water conveyance facilities with unused capacity to make them available to others in return for “fair compensation.” In this long-simmering dispute between Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District (Central), which supplies surface water to agricultural customers, and Stockton East Water District (Stockton East), which operates the conveyance system through which the water flows, the trial court was required to determine whether the compensation demanded by Stockton East for transporting (wheeling) Central’s water was “fair” under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. San Diego Cnty. Water Auth. v. Metro. Water Dist. of S. Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. San Diego Co. Water v. Metropolitan Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. San Diego County Water etc. v. Metropolitan Water Dist. etc.California Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API