Legal Opinion

Guckenheimer & Son v. Day & Higgs

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 19, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Partnership. Attachment. Amendment. Levy and •Sale. Before Judge Bower. Appling Superior Court. March Term, 1884. Kejjorted in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

The plaintiffs, by their agent, made an affidavit to procure an attachment against “ Joseph Day and Isaac Higgs, doing business under the name and style of Day & Higgs,” in which it was alleged that they owed plaintiffs $150, and that thé said “ Day & Higgs conceal themselves.” They also gave the bond required in such cases-, which was ex•ecuted in their name by their said agent. The sheriff served the writ by entering thereon this levy:

“I have this day levied the within attachment on all the goods in the store of Day & Higgs, as the property of Day & Higgs, at twenty minutes…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Draper Canning Co. v. DempseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Chaffee v. Runkel, Rowley & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Fine v. Frankel Clothing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API