Legal Opinion

Chaffee v. Runkel, Rowley & Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Meade_ county. Hon. A. J. Plowman, Judge. Attachment by Ambrose D. Chaffee against Runkel, Rowley & Co., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of South Dakota. Prom an order overruling a motion to discharge the attachment, defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the Court

Puller. J.

“That the defendant is about to assign, sell, and dispose of its property with intent to defraud its creditors, and especially this plaintiff,” is the ground upon which an attachment issued; and this appeal is from an order overruling á motion to discharge such attachment, made by the defendant corporation, and supported by the affidavits of its president and other officers having charge of a sawmill; which, together with other machinery used in connection therewith, was, by virtue of the writ, levied upon, In opposition to the motion, *335affidavits were presented to the court from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tilton v. CofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Guckenheimer & Son v. Day & HiggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jolley v. DunlopSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Summerfield v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Farmers Elevator Co. v. KapaunSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Smith v. Runkel, Rowley & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Pillar v. Runkel, Rowley & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API