Legal Opinion
Ludeke v. Heintzelman
Fairfax County Circuit Court
Decided January 29, 1998No. Case No. (Chancery) 146091PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
By Judge Arthur B. Vieregg, Jr.
This case frames the question of whether restrictive covenants encumbering the Heights of Penderbrook condominium development forbid unrelated adult lessees from occupying condo units. Cross-motions for summary judgment addressing this question were argued before this court on December 19,1997.1 took the case under advisement. I am now ready to rule.
This case requires the interpretation of the following restrictive covenant encumbering the Heights of Penderbrook, a condominium located in Fairfax County:
A. Each Unit and the Common Elements shall be occupied and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- The Centennial Life Insurance Company v. Barbara Poston Victor PostonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Turner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. BishopSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
- Friedberg v. Riverpoint Building CommitteeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Homestead Properties of Front Royal, Inc. v. Sky Bryce Ass'nShenandoah County Circuit Court · 1999