Legal Opinion

Dardenne Realty Co. v. Abeken

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit in equity brought by plaintiff to perpetually enjoin the diversion of, or interference with, the usual flow of water in a natural watercourse, and further for a mandatory injunction to require defendants to remove a certain dam from said watercourse and to close certain diversion ditches leading away from the natural channel of said watercourse.

The evidence shows that plaintiff is the owner of 1460 acres of land in St. Charles County, and that there are located on this land two lakes, Big Rondeau and little Rondeau, having areas of approximately 800 acres and 200 acres…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Greisinger v. KlinhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Fessler v. FesslerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Munkres v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  4. Sigler v. Inter-River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  5. Ranney v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Duncan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Elder v. DelcourSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Keener v. SharpSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Bollinger v. HenrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  5. Edward Runge Land Co. v. BuschMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API