Legal Opinion
State of Mich. v. City of Allen Park
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 2, 1983No. Civ. A. 79-74681, 79-74682 and 83-CV-2732-DTPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEIKENS, Chief Judge.
OPINION
This matter arises out of a long standing dispute concerning the water quality of the North Branch of the Ecorse Creek. A final order and judgment in this matter was entered on June 30, 1980. That judgment required, inter alia, that defendant Allen Park take certain measures to alleviate water pollution. Allen Park here moves to have that order modified pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b)(5). Jurisdiction is conferred pursuant to Section 505 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365(a), and 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
I. BACKGROUND
Although the procedural and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Walter L. Compton, Jr. v. Alton Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Southwest Airlines Company v. Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Texas Aeronautics Commission, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ahearn v. Charter Township of BloomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- State of Michigan (90-1902) United States Environmental Protection Agency (90-1901) v. The City of Allen ParkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- United States v. Winchester Municipal Utilities, the Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Tidik v. RitsemaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.