United States v. Winchester Municipal Utilities, the Commonwealth of Kentucky
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the district court abused its discretion in ordering the United States to pay substantial attorney fees to a municipal utility found to have been violating the environmental protection laws. The district court awarded the fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and drew additional support for the award from Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P., and 28 U.S.C. § 1927. The court held, among other things, that the utility had prevailed in the litigation against it and that the government’s insistence that the utility pay a civil penalty…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Albert JACKSON, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Sheila L. Logan v. Dayton Hudson Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation Kellermeyer Building Services, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States of America, and Cross v. Earth Sciences, Inc., and CrossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Gaston Copper Recycling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Thomas Kelly and Jonathan Prisk v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States Ex Rel. Wall v. Circle C Construction, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Espinosa v. Roswell Tower, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.