PRINCE v. Nicholson
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
This appeal involves a claim of the appellee, Howard Nicholson, against his employer, R. E. Prince, and the latter’s insurance carrier, T. H. Mastín & Company (Consolidated Underwriters), who are appellants here, for compensation benefits under the provisions of the Mississippi Workmen’s Compensation Act as amended. It is the claim of the appellee that while in the employment of the appellant, R. E. Prince, on January 18, 1954, in Noxubee County, Mississippi, he suffered a cerebral hemorrhage, resulting in a stroke which paralyzed his entire right side, and that said injury arose out of and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dixie Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Mississippi Public Service CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
- Coleman v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1945
- Sunnyland Contract. Co., Inc. v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Mississippi Products, Inc. v. GordyMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
- Childress v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Big" 2" Engine Rebuilders v. FreemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
- Adams v. Lemuria, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 1999
- New & Hughes Drilling Company v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
- Alexander Smith, Inc. v. GenetteMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
- White Top & Safeway Cab Co. v. WrightMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.