Scott v. Atlas Press Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
RAYMOND, District Judge.
Defendant urges that the parties hereto had the right to enter into the agreement of October 17, 1938, upon the authority of Walling v. A. H. Belo Corporation, 316 U.S. 624, 62 S.Ct. 1223, 86 L.Ed. 1716, (hereinafter referred to as the “Belo case”). With this contention, the court is unable to agree.
From the various authorities cited in the .briefs of. 'counsel, it is evident that the validity of an agreement purporting to establish regular rates of pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., depends upon the' essential purpose and.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Fleming v. AH Belo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walling v. LivernoisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1943
- Walling v. Harnischfeger Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1943
- Castle v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Walling v. L. J. Mueller Furnace Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1943
- Walling v. CastleDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.