Legal Opinion
State v. DiPrete
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided July 18, 1997No. 96-604-C.APublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEDERBERG, Justice.
This case presents our first consideration of the issuance of pretrial subpoenas duces tecum, pursuant to Rule 17(c) of the Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure. The State of Rhode Island (state) has appealed an order denying its motion for the disclosure of evidence obtained by the defendants, Edward D. DiPrete and Dennis L. DiPrete, following the granting by the trial justice of the ex parte application of the defendants for issuance of pretrial subpoenas duces tecum pursuant to Rule 17(c). In addition, the state has challenged the trial justice’s denial of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- State v. CoelhoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
- United States v. NoriegaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
- United States v. Tou HangCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Andrew Lee RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Commonwealth v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- United States v. FoxDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2003
- State v. SantosSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- United States v. FoxDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.