United States v. Fox
District Court, D. Nebraska
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KOPF, Chief Judge.
At a hearing held on August 12, 2003, this matter came on to consider the motion (filing 139) for a subpoena to produce documents prior to trial directed at the Nebraska State Patrol. 1 The defense seeks the documents to support its pretrial motion that the traffic stop in this case was the product of racial profiling. For the reasons stated below, I granted the basic relief sought by the defense.
I now explain the reasons for my ruling. I will also clarify my earlier ruling regarding ex parte consideration of these types of motions, and I will set forth…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Tou HangCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. BeckfordDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- United States v. UrlacherDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1991
- United States v. FlorackDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. HareDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2004