Legal Opinion

United States v. Fox

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided August 13, 2003No. 4:03CR3006-2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KOPF, Chief Judge.

At a hearing held on August 12, 2003, this matter came on to consider the motion (filing 139) for a subpoena to produce documents prior to trial directed at the Nebraska State Patrol. 1 The defense seeks the documents to support its pretrial motion that the traffic stop in this case was the product of racial profiling. For the reasons stated below, I granted the basic relief sought by the defense.

I now explain the reasons for my ruling. I will also clarify my earlier ruling regarding ex parte consideration of these types of motions, and I will set forth…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. Tou HangCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. BeckfordDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
  4. United States v. UrlacherDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1991
  5. United States v. FlorackDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HareDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API