Terranova v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1DissentHolohan, Justice
For many years this court and a host of other state courts have recognized a difference in the nature of the duty owed by a railroad company to motorists in “blocked crossing” cases versus “approaching train” cases. The long line of Arizona cases beginning with Doty v. Southern Pac. Co., 59 Ariz. 449, 129 P.2d 991 (1942), hold that the only duty a railroad owes to the traveling public when it blocks a crossing is to provide an adequate warning. Until the court’s decision today that has been the consistent and often repeated rule for “blocked crossing” cases.
The court now maintains that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- DeElena v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Cope v. Southern Pac. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Doty v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. RenfroeArizona Supreme Court · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.