Legal Opinion

Hauser v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Company

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1969No. 3-66 Civ. 355PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

NEVILLE, District Judge.

This is a class action instituted on behalf of 37 former employees of the Metal Fabricating Division of defendant Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Company (FOK) against that company and against Local 970 of the Teamsters Union (Union) and two of its individual officials. The dispute arises first over who- is entitled to the cash proceeds of a non-contributory pension fund remaining upon the cessation of business by FOK’s Metal Fabricating Division and the expiration of a collective bargaining agreement and second over whether, despite the cessation of business…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Alvares v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Joyce J. Beam v. International Organization of Masters, Mates, and PilotsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Alvares v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Arthur Dwyer v. Climatrol Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. Chambers v. Kaleidoscope, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and TrustDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API