Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Dzienny

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2002No. 2002-0294PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 96 Ohio St.3d 144.] TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. DZIENNY. [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Dzienny,

2002-Ohio-3611.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Eighteen-month suspension with one year of sanction suspended on condition that attorney commit no further misconduct—Preparing inter vivos trusts for client and naming himself as a beneficiary. (No. 2002-0294—Submitted May 7, 2002—Decided July 31, 2002.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 01-57. Per Curiam. {¶1} We must decide…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. DziennyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Toledo Bar Assn. v. DziennyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. DziennyOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. NewmanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DziennyOhio Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API