Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Dzienny
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} We must decide in this case whether an attorney who prepared inter vivos trusts for a client and named himself as a beneficiary should be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio or receive a lesser penalty. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”) recommended that respondent, Michael A. Dzienny of Toledo, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0037618, receive an indefinite suspension for having violated DR 1-102(A)(6) (engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on an attorney’s fitness to practice law), 5-101(A)(l) (accepting…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Toledo Bar Ass'n v. DziennyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. DziennyOhio Supreme Court · 2002