Legal Opinion

Szrama v. Alumo Products Co.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided April 28, 1983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph D. Mintz, J.

Defendants Alumo Products Co., Inc. (Alumo) and Bison Plumbing City (Bison) move for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ sixth, seventh and eighth causes of action on the basis of the Statute of Limitations, *1009defendant Alumo moves for partial summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ sixth, seventh and eighth causes of action on the grounds of lack of privity and defendant Bison moves for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ fifth cause of action on the basis that a retailer is not strictly liable in tort.

The facts as alleged in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Martin v. Julius Dierck Equipment Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Randy Knitwear, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Mendel v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Mead v. Warner Pruyn DivisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Halloran v. Toledo Scale Co.New York Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API