Legal Opinion

Penn v. State

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 11, 2008No. 97,755PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

James A. Penn appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his K.S.A. 60-1507 motion. Penn argues that our Supreme Court’s denial of his appellate counsel’s request to file a petition for review out of time should not bar his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel’s failure to timely file a petition for review. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse, and Penn, if he wishes to do so, may file a petition for review with our Supreme Court if the petition is filed within 30 days of the mandate issued in this appeal.

In 1999, a jury convicted Penn…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. PhinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. Laymon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  5. Swenson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. In re Marriage of PoggiCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API