Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gagnier v. Curran Construction Company

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1968No. 11388Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Haswell

I concur in that part of the majority opinion disallowing punitive damages for the reasons therein stated; I dissent from that part of the majority opinion disallowing compensatory damages.

In this case a 9 year old child was killed by the cave-in of an excavation created and maintained in a dangerous condition by a building contractor who did absolutely nothing to protect anyone. The majority opinion completely absolves the contractor from any liability for the child’s death as a matter of law, reversing a jury verdict in the process. In my view, this is unjust.

*481As I read the majority opinion,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Shawnee v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Fink v. Missouri Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. Cicero State Bank v. Dolese & Shepard Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  4. Fink v. Missouri Furnace Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Peters v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API