Las Vegas Valley Water District v. Michelas

*172OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

Respondent agrees with appellant’s statement of the legal issue presented to this court, adding only the last phrase as italicized to appellant’s statement of the issue. It is as follows:

“May the Appellant, Las Vegas Valley Water District, supply water service in an area where Respondent may and does already supply water service under a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the Nevada Public Service Commission without the payment of just compensation to Respondent?”

Likewise, in pre-trial proceedings, it was ordered, pursuant to stipulation,…