Smith v. Laflar
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
The judgment in favor of plaintiff on former appeal was reversed for the reason that there was no evidence that plaintiff had paid to defendant anything for his transportation at time of injury and, as a guest, could not recover under section 55-1209, Oregon Code 1930, unless it be shown that “such accident shall have been intentional on the part of said owner or operator or eaused by his gross negligence or intoxication or his reckless disregard of the rights of others”. After dismissing the first action, plaintiff instituted a second one charging the defendant with gross negligence in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Storla v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Transportation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Goebel v. VaughtOregon Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Williams v. Portland General Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
- French v. TebbenIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Storm v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Rogers v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.