Legal Opinion

Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. v. Houma Town House Apartments, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1970No. 8017PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLANCHE, Judge.

Plaintiff, Rosenthal and Rosenthal, Inc., filed suit for a deficiency judgment against defendants, Houma Town House Apartments, Inc., the maker of a promissory note, and Thomas R. Pruyn and C. S. Pruyn, Jr., the endorsers thereof. This note was secured by a second mortgage on apartments owned by the corporate defendant, against whom plaintiff had previously brought foreclosure proceedings and had the collateral seized and sold. The two individual defendants herein, hereinafter referred to collectively as “Pruyn,” were not made parties defendant in the execu-tory proceeding, but…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  2. Berger v. DeSalvoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Mayfield v. NunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  4. Clasen v. Excel Finance Causeway, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Osborne v. Mossler Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In The Matter Of Jules B. Leblanc, IiiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Grunewald v. BartholomewLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Paulat v. PirelloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Brinkley v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage & Realty TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API