Shaw v. State

OPINION

McCLUNG, Justice.

Reginald Shaw appeals his conviction for the offense of theft. The trial court assessed punishment at twenty years confinement. Shaw contends that his theft offense was improperly enhanced with a pri- or theft-type conviction of forgery. This contention is without merit. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 1.14(b) reads, in relevant part:

If the defendant does not object to a defect, error, or irregularity of form or substance in an indictment or information before the date on which the trial on the merits commences, he…