Legal Opinion

In re the Detention of Albrecht

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 10, 2001No. 17643-6-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, C.J.

The statutory scheme for the civil commitment of an alleged sexual predator distinguishes between a person who is in confinement and a person who has been released from confinement into the community. In the latter instance, the State is required to allege and prove “a recent overt act.” This is the result of the holdings of the Washington State Supreme Court in In re Harris, 98 Wn.2d 276, 284-85, 654 P.2d 109 (1982) and In re Personal Restraint of Young, 122 Wn.2d 1, 41-42, 857 P.2d 989 (1993). These cases hold that constitutional due process requires proof of “dan*166gerousness” by a “recent…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Rettkowski v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. In Re Commitment of PZHNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. In re the Detention of LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API