Legal Opinion

Caggiano v. Medtronic, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1988No. 86AP-1170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Appellant, Viola F. Cag-giano, has had a history of medical problems, including problems with her heart. Her first cardiac pacemaker implant took place in 1968. Pacemaker generators must be replaced periodically and appellee Medtronic, Inc.’s cardiac pacemaker generator, Model 5976, was implanted into appellant’s chest in December 1981. Appellant experienced difficulties, dizziness, etc., and sought help from her cardiologist. Her cardiologist, through a surgical process, found that the generator was operating properly. He reattached the generator and implanted new leads. During or soon after…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ohio v. HymoreOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ault v. International Harvester Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Knitz v. Minster Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State Auto Mutual Ins. v. Chrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Felden v. Ashland Chemical Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Smith v. Raymond Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API