Legal Opinion

Childs Instant Homes, Inc. v. Miller

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1992No. 2185PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

Appellants, Robert and Doris Miller and their daughter, Barbara, appeal from an adverse judgment against them in an ejectment action pursued by appellee, Childs Instant Homes, Inc.

The Millers owned and, through their daughter, occupied a mobile home which was located, pursuant to a lease, in a mobile home park owned by Childs. There is no question that the tenancy at Childs is one covered by the “Mobile Home Park Rights Act” (MHPRA) of November 24, 1976, 68 P.S. § 398.1 et seq. The question is, however, whether the owner was bound to and did duly comply with the requirements…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers v. Commonwealth, Bureau of Employment Security Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Kuriger v. CramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Appeal of Mt. Laurel Racing Ass'n v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Malvern Courts, Inc. v. StephensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cole v. CzeganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Lincoln Warehouses, Inc. v. CromptonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Lincoln Warehouses, Inc. v. CromptonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Lincoln Warehouses, Inc. v. CromptonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API