Ramnarain v. City of New York
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
VITALIANO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Deonarine Ramnarain moves this Court for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 against pro se defendant David Inshiqaq. For the reasons stated below and in the absence of any opposition by Inshiqaq, plaintiffs motion is granted.
Background
Plaintiff brought this action on November 22, 2004 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that he sustained personal injury at the hands of Inshiqaq, an employee of the defendant City of New York. After the completion of discovery, the parties entered into a stipulation of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Vermont Teddy Bear Co. v. 1-800 BEARGRAM Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Prevezon Holdings, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Trustees of the Local 531 Pension Fund v. Flexwrap Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Charter Oak Fire Insurance v. Fleet Building Maintenance, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009