Legal Opinion

Amaral v. Post Falls Highway District

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided December 3, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00213Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO SUSAN AMARAL, an individual, and SHANE P. AMARAL, an individual, Case No. 2:24-cv-00213-AKB Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. POST FALLS HIGHWAY DISTRICT, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant Post Falls Highway District’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion for an Extension of Time to File Answer. (Dkt. 4). Plaintiffs, Susan and Shane Amaral, are proceeding pro se. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions, the Court finds that the facts and legal argument are adequately presented and that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Knick v. Township of ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API