Legal Opinion

Hughes v. M&T Bank

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 18, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01993Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT □ FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND RICHARD ROBERT HUGHES, * Plaintiff, * v. * Civ. No. JKB-23-1993 M&T BANK, et al., * Defendants. * * * * * * * * *& * * * * * MEMORANDUM Richard Robert Hughes, proceeding pro se, sued M&T Bank and various of its employees for intentional infliction of emotional distress (“ITED”) based on a dispute that occurred at the bank’s South Cumberland branch in late 2021. (See generally ECF No. 19 at 1-3; ECF Nos. 22, 31.) Now pending is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 48.) The Motion is fully briefed, and no hearing is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API