Hughes v. M&T Bank
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT □ FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND RICHARD ROBERT HUGHES, * Plaintiff, * v. * Civ. No. JKB-23-1993 M&T BANK, et al., * Defendants. * * * * * * * * *& * * * * * MEMORANDUM Richard Robert Hughes, proceeding pro se, sued M&T Bank and various of its employees for intentional infliction of emotional distress (“ITED”) based on a dispute that occurred at the bank’s South Cumberland branch in late 2021. (See generally ECF No. 19 at 1-3; ECF Nos. 22, 31.) Now pending is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 48.) The Motion is fully briefed, and no hearing is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.