Legal Opinion

Snisky v. Pennsylvania State Police

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion By

President Judge COLINS.

Snisky filed a petition for review of the of a decision of the Background Investigation Appeal Panel (Appeal Panel)1 of the Pennsylvania State Police disqualifying him as a candidate for appointment as a Pennsylvania State Police Cadet because of an alleged altercation with his wife and immature conduct.

The issue on appeal is whether a candidate for appointment as a Pennsylvania State Police Cadet has a sufficient personal property right in employment, which would require a hearing before disqualification and would further allow an appeal from a decision by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pipkin v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Marino v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Bolden v. Pennsylvania State PoliceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Graham v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Bloomfield v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Woods Services, Inc. v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Foxworth v. Pennsylvania State PoliceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Snisky v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API