Legal Opinion

Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 30, 1951No. 12699_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

In these cases the District Court found that a satisfactory solution could not be reached on the evidence before it. That court, therefore, continued the causes sine die and entered the following order:

“1. That the trial of this cause will be continued sine die;
“2. That the said motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice;
“3. That said motion for dismissal or in the alternative for substitution of attorneys is denied without prejudice;
“4. That the defendant is hereby permitted to deposit in the Registry of this Court the said sum of $626,860.07, subject to the further order of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Schaff v. R. W. Claxton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  3. Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1950
  4. Greene v. United Shoe Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. N. Cypress Med. Ctr. Operating Co. v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  4. Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  5. Pfizer, Inc. v. LordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API