Legal Opinion

Drexler v. Tyrrell

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1880No. 997PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, Storey County. The facts are stated in the- opinion. I. The mortgage in ibis case was executed in the name of J. H. Latham for the purpose of defrauding the revenues of the State of Nevada. Upon this point there is no conflict of testimony, for Drexler’s own testimony shows that to have been the object. Such being the fact, the mortgage should be held to be void.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, Storey County. The facts are stated in the- opinion. I. The mortgage in ibis case was executed in the name of J. H. Latham for the purpose of defrauding the revenues of the State of Nevada. Upon this point there is no conflict of testimony, for Drexler’s own testimony shows that to have been the object. Such being the fact, the mortgage should be held to be void. (De Witt v. Brisbane, 16 N. Y. 508; Wheeler v. Bussell, 17 Mass. 258; 2 Chitty on Contracts (lltli ed.), 971-976, and notes; 4 D. & E. 466; 5 Id. 242; Bixby v. Moor, 51…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Leonard, J.:

Some time prior to May 6, 1876, the defendants purchased the property described in the complaint herein, situate in Virginia City, in this state, at which time there was a mortgage thereon for ten thousand dollars, owned in fact by L. P. Drexler & Co., brokers in Virginia City, although it does not appear with certainty in whose name said note and mortgage were taken.

On the twenty-fourth day of May, 1876, at plaintiff’s request, at Virginia City, defendants executed and delivered a new interest-bearing note, with mortgage upon the same property as security, to J. H.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hannay v. EveSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  2. Gibbs v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Aiken v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869
  4. Gaston v. DrakeNevada Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Dial v. HairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Crowns v. Forest Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Arman v. Structiform Engineering Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Mandlebaum v. GregovichNevada Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Callicott v. AllenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Martinez v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API