Legal Opinion

Callicott v. Allen

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1903No. 4,438PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Erom the Superior Court of Vanderburgh County; J. H. Hosier, Judge. Suit by Harrison Callicott against Lucy S. Allen. Erom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff' appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

The single question presented for decision by this appeal is the sufficiency of appellant’s complaint, to which a demurrer for want of facts was sustained.

The complaint avers the following material facts: That one Charles Rucker on May 8, 1898, was the owner of certain real estate in the city of Evansville, Indiana, and that on that day, his wife joining him, he executed to one Charles D. Briggs, of the State of Illinois, a mortgage on the real estate, to secure the payment of one principal note for $1,200, due in three years from date, and certain interest notes maturing every six months…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. PruessnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. Crowns v. Forest Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Drexler v. TyrrellNevada Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Stilwell v. CorwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hiatt v. YerginIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Hogston v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Murray v. WhiteMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Morrell v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Alter v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API