Legal Opinion
Whitehead v. the Nautilus Group, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided April 18, 2006No. 05-CV-4074PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BARNES, District Court.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Thomas E. Whitehead’s Motion to Remand. (Doc. 10) Defendants The Nautilus Group, Inc. and Nautilus Direct d/b/a Bowflex (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Nautilus”) filed a response and a supplement to their response. (Docs. 13 and 16) On January 27, 2006, the Court held a hearing on the motion. (Doc. 18) After the hearing, Plaintiff filed a supplement to his motion to remand, (Doc. 19) and Defendants filed a response to the supplement. (Doc. 20) The Court finds the motion ripe for consideration.
I.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Michael A. Lupo v. Human Affairs International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- William Schorsch, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Mary Plubell, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Merck & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. Bindan Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2013
- Buller Trucking Co. v. Owner Operator Independent Driver Risk Retention Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
- Jax Leasing, LLC v. RuanUnited States Circuit Court · 2019
- Pleasant v. Noble Finance Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2014
- Czapla v. Republic Servs., Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.