Lovel v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
QUENTIN KEITH, Commissioner.
On March 24, 1976, this Court found that appellant’s brief was filed late in the trial court and that a review of the record revealed nothing that should be considered in the interest of justice. We affirmed the judgment of the trial court in a per curiam opinion. Appellant timely moved for leave to file a motion for rehearing in which he contended that the brief was actually filed within an extended period fixed by the trial court. Although we disagree with the factual basis of the motion, we have, nevertheless, granted…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cherb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Adami v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Stein v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Ex Parte MartinezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Hurd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Shiflet v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Huffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Wilder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.