Legal Opinion

Cook v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1921No. 23,970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Marion Criminal Court (50,793) ; James A. Collins, Judge. Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Seeman Cook. From a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, C. J.

*4141. *413The only error properly assigned is overruling the motion for a new trial. An affidavit in five counts was filed against the appellant. She was found guilty only on the first count, which charged that at a time and place named she “did then and there unlawfully furnish and dispose of to William Hill intoxicating liquor, to wit, whisky,” etc. William Hill testified. that appellant sold him a half-pint of whisky, and that he paid her $3 for it, and was arrested a few minutes later while he and two other men were drinking it. One of the men arrested with him and the policeman who arrested them…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Underhill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Koehler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hawkins v. RiemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Heyverests v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Doerner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Starks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Bonadies v. SiskIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API