Hawkins v. Rieman
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Union Circuit Court; Raymond S. Springer, Judge. Action by Andrew H. Rieman against David Hawkins. From a judgment for plaintiff, the .defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.
This is an action by appellee against *129the appellant to recover upon three promissory notes, each for $500, and alleged to have been executed by the appellant to one Bertha Musser, and by her assigned in writing to appellee. The appellant answered: (1) General denial; (2) no consideration; (3) that appellee was not the real party in interest; (4) non est factum. Appellee filed a reply of general denial. Trial by jury. Verdict and judgment for appellee. The error assigned is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial.
1. Appellant first contends that the court erred in admitting each…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Cook v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Credit Equipment Corp. v. SteinerOhio Court of Appeals · 1959