Legal Opinion

People v. Fay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1945PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

One of the defendants-appellants, Joseph S. Fay, called thirteen character witnesses who testified to his reputation for honesty and fair dealing. It is claimed that the District Attorney improperly cross-examined eight of such witnesses.

A defendant who calls character witnesses makes his own reputation a subject of inquiry at the trial and the People have the right to cross-examine such witnesses upon the subject of inquiry thus presented and may properly ask if the witnesses heard particular reports derogatory to defendant’s character to determine credibility and to show the witnesses’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. . McKaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. People v. . BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. State v. CrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. People v. . LaudieroNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. People v. McKaneNew York Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fay v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. People v. MelendezNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. AlamoNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. People v. KussNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. People v. FerraioliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API