Lord & Stevens, Inc. v. 3D Printing, Inc.

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] 3D Printing, Inc. (“3D”), appeals from a judgment dismissing its counterclaim against Lord & Stevens, Inc, doing business as Express Press (collectively *791“Express Press”), for expenses incurred during the parties’ unsuccessful attempt to merge their printing companies. We conclude the district court’s finding the parties’ agreement “contemplated that no expenses would be paid” is not clearly erroneous, and therefore, 3D’s attempt to use the doctrine of unjust enrichment based on an implied in law contract to recoup those expenses is unavailing as a matter of law. We…