Chestnut Hill Industries, Inc. v. Regal Accessories, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Jacob Markowitz, J,
Both parties seek to resettle a consent decree previously entered in this action, The decree, as submitted to Special Term, Part JI of this court hy plaintiff contained the provision herein sought to he inserted- However, that provision was stricken from the decree when it was entered, The deeree? entered upon a stipulation of the parties, enjoined defendant from further use or imitation of plaintiff’s symbol in connection with the advertisement or gale of merchandise produced hy if. Thg provision herein concerned provides <f orheeed Aíro ABjuBOpo that in the event that any…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gilbert v. BurnstineNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In Re the Estate of MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Taylor v. RootNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- In re the Accounting of First Trust & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Taylor v. RootNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.