Legal Opinion
Durante Bros. & Sons, Inc. v. Flushing National Bank
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 27, 1983No. 80 C 1385PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a New York corporation, brought this action against Flushing National Bank (the Bank) and two of its officials, claiming violations of Title IX, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations, of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (the Act), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq., the Federal banking laws, 12 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq., and New York state law.
Defendants moved for summary judgment on six of the seventeen counts in the amended complaint, urging that (1) counts one, three and five are barred by the statute of limitations, (2) counts two…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MazeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Calderone Enterprises Corporation v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Mendel Schwimmer D/B/A Supersonic Electronics Co. v. Sony Corporation of America and Sony CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Durante Bros. And Sons, Inc. v. Flushing National Bank, Jack Farber and Richard GelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Great So. Nat. v. McCullough Env. Serv.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Teltronics Services, Inc. v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Willamette Savings & Loan v. Blake & Neal Finance Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.