Legal Opinion

Sikes v. Seckinger

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1927No. 5526PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

A donee of land under a parol gift based upon a meritorious consideration, who, with the consent of the donor, enters into possession and makes valuable improvements upon the faith of the gift, acquires a perfect equity as against the donor, his heirs and those claiming under him with notice. Floyd v. Floyd, 97 Ga. 124 (24 S. E. 451); Looney v. Watson, 97 Ga. 235 (22 S. E. 935); Ogden v. Dodge County, 97 Ga. 461 (25 S. E. 321); Garbutt v. Mayo, 128 Ga. 269 (2) (57 S. E. 495, 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 58). It is now well settled that in such circumstances the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Winter v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  2. May v. SorrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Peacock v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  4. Walker v. NeilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Terry v. RodahanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ryder v. SchreederSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. Latham v. FowlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Thomas v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Kemp v. NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Bowles v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API