Legal Opinion

Lippard v. . Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1939PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BarNhili,, J.

A careful examination of tbe complaint discloses that tbe plaintiff makes only two allegations of negligence: (1) That tbe defendant, in undertaking to induce a condition of local anesthesia, used a quantity of liquid containing a high percentage of some caustic and deleterious chemical or chemicals; and (2) that tbe defendant failed to diagnose tbe condition of tbe plaintiff’s trouble which developed after tbe performance of tbe surgery for which be bad been employed, and to use proper remedies for its alleviation and ultimate cure. There is no allegation that tbe defendant does…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Covington v. . JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Covington v. JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Mountain Sanitarium & Asheville Agr. Sch.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Smith v. . Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Baker v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1964
  4. Buckner Ex Rel. Buckner v. WheeldonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Hanrahan v. Walgreen CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API