Legal Opinion

Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis v. City of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1995No. 68025PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

Defendants, The City of St. Louis (City) and City’s Director of Personnel, William Duffe, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, in a court-tried case, which granted declaratory judgment in favor of plaintiff, The Firemen’s Retirement System of St. Louis, and which enjoined City and its Director of Personnel from employing as a fire fighter defendant, Edward Kareh,1 who was retired from City’s fire department and receiving retirement benefits. We reverse.

Our review of a court-tried case is guided by Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). In the ease before…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. City of Hamilton v. Public Water Supply District 2 of Caldwell CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. Firemen's Retirement System v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bercier v. KigaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. Bercier v. KigaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Law v. City of MaryvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Matheson v. GregoireCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Matheson v. GregoireCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API